Checksum is now a Google Partner

Checksum AI and Google Cloud: End-to-End Testing AI Innovation

Checksum is now a Google Partner

Checksum AI and Google Cloud: End-to-End Testing AI Innovation

Checksum is now

a Google Cloud Partner

Unlock the True Potential
of AI-Driven QA Automation

Discover why ongoing metrics tracking for AI powered software testing is critical to improve software quality. Also it ultimately reduces costs and overhead for fast-paced engineering teams.

Why Market Metrics Matter

QA teams face complex challenges that affect testing speed, cost, and reliability. Our customer metrics tracking is designed to address these critical issues with AI-powered solutions.

Unified, Fully Autonomous QA

QA relies heavily on manual testing or a mish-mash of tools, consuming too much human bandwidth.

QA That Moves at Engineering Speed

Young, fast-growing dev teams require new, cutting-edge testing solutions to keep up.

Purpose-Built for AI-Native Products

Generative AI companies need modern AI testing tools to match their rapid development cycles.

Modern AI-Driven Testing

Old frameworks like Cypress and Selenium are outdated; migrating to Playwright is complex and painful.

Quality That Pays for Itself

Companies with fragile, manual tests still lose $300k–$1M+ per hour of downtime.

Teams without adaptive AI testing still ship bugs that cost 5-10× more when found in production.

Organizations running outdated QA add to the $2.41T annual loss from poor software quality.

Important Software QA Metrics

Measuring the true performance of AI-driven QA automation.

Production Failures on Manual vs Checksum AI Maintained Rate Comparison

Across all customers we measured failures at the test run level, separately for suites that use Checksum and suites that do not.

AI maintained (Checksum metrics)

Manual/legacy

Why automation breaks

Looking at 18,000 randomly sampled failures, we tagged each one by primary cause. Multiple things may be wrong in a single run, but we assign the category based on what needed to change for the test to pass again.

What maintenance actually costs

Once you know how often tests fail, why they fail, and how long each fix takes, you can accurately calculate the true cost of test maintenance.

Real-world Numbers
from customers

Experience measurable impact with AI-powered QA automation — faster test creation, easier maintenance, and dramatically lower costs, all backed by real customer data from leading engineering teams.

>80%

cost reduction in QA processes

10h

developer time saved per issue

80%

reduction in time
to write tests

80%

reduction in time
to maintain tests

90%+

resilience to product changes

Calculate Your Time & Cost Savings by Using AI-Powered Test Auto-healing

Enter your number of automated tests. We’ll estimate how much time your team saves when AI maintains them instead of manual fixes.

Results

Calculate your savings

Ready to Ship Faster



and More Confidently?

If you want to quickly find out where your app is buggy,



book a demo with Checksum.

Unlock the True Potential
of AI-Driven QA Automation

Discover why ongoing metrics tracking for AI powered software testing is critical to improve software quality. Also it ultimately reduces costs and overhead for fast-paced engineering teams.

Why Market Metrics Matter

QA teams face complex challenges that affect testing speed, cost, and reliability. Our customer metrics tracking is designed to address these critical issues with AI-powered solutions.

Unified, Fully Autonomous QA

QA relies heavily on manual testing or a mish-mash of tools, consuming too much human bandwidth.

Modern AI-Driven Testing

Old frameworks like Cypress and Selenium are outdated; migrating to Playwright is complex and painful.

QA That Moves at Engineering Speed

Young, fast-growing dev teams require new, cutting-edge testing solutions to keep up.

Purpose-Built for AI-Native Products

Generative AI companies need modern AI testing tools to match their rapid development cycles.

Quality That Pays for Itself

Companies with fragile, manual tests still lose $300k–$1M+ per hour of downtime.

Teams without adaptive AI testing still ship bugs that cost 5-10× more when found in production.

Organizations running outdated QA add to the $2.41T annual loss from poor software quality.

Important Software QA Metrics

Measuring the true performance of AI-driven QA automation.

Production Failures on Manual vs Checksum AI Maintained Rate Comparison

Across all customers we measured failures at the test run level, separately for suites that use Checksum and suites that do not.

AI maintained (Checksum metrics)

Manual/legacy

Why automation breaks

Looking at 18,000 randomly sampled failures, we tagged each one by primary cause. Multiple things may be wrong in a single run, but we assign the category based on what needed to change for the test to pass again.

What maintenance actually costs

Once you know how often tests fail, why they fail, and how long fixes take, you can calculate the true cost of test maintenance.

Real-world Numbers
from customers

Experience measurable impact with AI-powered QA automation — faster test creation, easier maintenance, and dramatically lower costs, all backed by real customer data from leading engineering teams.

>80%

cost reduction in QA processes

10h

developer time saved
per issue

80%

reduction in time
to write tests

80%

reduction in time
to maintain tests

90%+

resilience to product
changes

Calculate Your Time & Cost Savings by Using AI-Powered Test Auto-healing

Enter your number of automated tests. We’ll estimate how much time your team saves when AI maintains them instead of manual fixes.

Results

Calculate your savings

Ready to measure your

QA automation?

Take the next step toward smarter, faster QA processes.

Unlock the True
Potential of AI-Driven
QA Automation

Discover why ongoing metrics tracking for AI powered software testing is critical to improve software quality. Also it ultimately reduces costs and overhead for fast-paced engineering teams.

Why Market Metrics Matter

QA teams face complex challenges that affect testing speed, cost, and reliability. Our customer metrics tracking is designed to address these critical issues with AI-powered solutions.

Unified, Fully Autonomous QA

QA relies heavily on manual testing or a mish-mash of tools, consuming too much human bandwidth.

Modern AI-Driven Testing

Old frameworks like Cypress and Selenium are outdated; migrating to Playwright is complex and painful.

QA That Moves at Engineering Speed

Young, fast-growing dev teams require new, cutting-edge testing solutions to keep up.

Purpose-Built for AI-Native Products

Generative AI companies need modern AI testing tools to match their rapid development cycles.

Quality That Pays for Itself

Companies with fragile, manual tests still lose $300k–$1M+ per hour of downtime.

Teams without adaptive AI testing still ship bugs that cost 5-10× more when found in production.

Organizations running outdated QA add to the $2.41T annual loss from poor software quality.

Important Software QA Metrics

Measuring the true performance of AI-driven QA automation.

Production Failures on Manual vs Checksum AI Maintained Rate Comparison

Across all customers we measured failures at the test run level, separately for suites that use Checksum and suites that do not.

AI maintained (Checksum metrics)

Manual/legacy

Why automation breaks

Looking at 18,000 randomly sampled failures, we tagged each one by primary cause. Multiple things may be wrong in a single run, but we assign the category based on what needed to change for the test to pass again.

What maintenance actually costs

Once you know how often tests fail, why they fail, and how long each fix takes, you can accurately calculate the true cost of test maintenance.

Real-world Numbers
from customers

Experience measurable impact with AI-powered QA automation — faster test creation, easier maintenance, and dramatically lower costs, all backed by real customer data from leading engineering teams.

>80%

cost reduction in QA processes

10h

developer time saved per issue

80%

reduction in time
to write tests

80%

reduction in time
to maintain tests

90%+

resilience to product changes

Calculate Your Time & Cost Savings by Using AI-Powered Test Auto-healing

Enter your number of automated tests. We’ll estimate how much time your team saves when AI maintains them instead of manual fixes.

Results

Calculate your savings

Ready to

measure your

QA automation?

Take the next step toward smarter, faster QA processes.